Proponent Fcu
Nutley, NJ · What the federal mortgage record shows about how Proponent Fcu treated New Jersey applicants, 2018–2025 — 763 reported decisions. This is historical behavior, not a prediction about your loan.
Share of 763 New Jersey applications Proponent Fcu approved vs. denied. Excludes loans it merely purchased on the secondary market, and applications withdrawn or left incomplete.
Approval rate by loan type
“NJ” = the statewide average approval rate for that loan type, for comparison.
Approval rate over time
Pricing
Adjusting for its loan-type mix, Proponent Fcu’s rates ran +2.65 pp higher than the typical New Jersey lender (average rate spread +2.88 pp above the market benchmark). Rate spread is APR minus the average prime offer rate; positive means costlier than the low-risk benchmark.
Who Proponent Fcu approves
Why Proponent Fcu denied applications
Where Proponent Fcu lends in NJ
| County | Decisions | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Essex County | 262 | 72.5% |
| Bergen County | 84 | 79.8% |
| Morris County | 77 | 84.4% |
| Passaic County | 69 | 87.0% |
| Somerset County | 43 | 86.0% |
| Middlesex County | 34 | 67.6% |
| Union County | 34 | 61.8% |
| Hudson County | 32 | 81.2% |
Fees & closing costs
Median lender and third-party costs (the Loan Estimate’s “total loan costs”) on Proponent Fcu’s home-purchase originations — 0.50 points lower than the 1.93% New Jersey median. Typical lender credit toward costs: $500. Excludes prepaid taxes/insurance and escrow deposits. Fees are reported on roughly two-thirds of originations (small lenders are exempt). Methodology →
Compare Proponent Fcu to other lenders for your profile
Enter your income, county, DTI and down payment to see who approves borrowers like you.
Open the approval tool →Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in New Jersey reported by Proponent Fcu (LEI 549300SI3EZ7U02L5E39). Rates describe past reported outcomes for the lender’s applicant pool and are not a prediction for any individual. Methodology →