North Jersey Federal Credit Union
Totowa, NJ · What the federal mortgage record shows about how North Jersey Federal Credit Union treated New Jersey applicants, 2018–2025 — 231 reported decisions. This is historical behavior, not a prediction about your loan.
Share of 231 New Jersey applications North Jersey Federal Credit Union approved vs. denied. Excludes loans it merely purchased on the secondary market, and applications withdrawn or left incomplete.
Approval rate by loan type
“NJ” = the statewide average approval rate for that loan type, for comparison.
Approval rate over time
Pricing
Adjusting for its loan-type mix, North Jersey Federal Credit Union’s rates ran +0.18 pp higher than the typical New Jersey lender (average rate spread +0.40 pp above the market benchmark). Rate spread is APR minus the average prime offer rate; positive means costlier than the low-risk benchmark.
Who North Jersey Federal Credit Union approves
Why North Jersey Federal Credit Union denied applications
Where North Jersey Federal Credit Union lends in NJ
| County | Decisions | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Passaic County | 75 | 82.7% |
| Essex County | 48 | 83.3% |
| Bergen County | 35 | 91.4% |
Fees & closing costs
Median lender and third-party costs (the Loan Estimate’s “total loan costs”) on North Jersey Federal Credit Union’s home-purchase originations — 0.06 points higher than the 1.93% New Jersey median. Excludes prepaid taxes/insurance and escrow deposits. Fees are reported on roughly two-thirds of originations (small lenders are exempt). Methodology →
Compare North Jersey Federal Credit Union to other lenders for your profile
Enter your income, county, DTI and down payment to see who approves borrowers like you.
Open the approval tool →Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in New Jersey reported by North Jersey Federal Credit Union (LEI 549300VFH2IXM3I18P78). Rates describe past reported outcomes for the lender’s applicant pool and are not a prediction for any individual. Methodology →